As temperatures rise and extreme heat events become more frequent, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has renewed its National Emphasis Program (NEP) on Outdoor and Indoor Heat-Related Hazards, extending enforcement through 2026.
For employers, this is a clear signal:
Heat safety planning is not just best practice -- it's an active enforcement priority.
This article explains what the renewed NEP means, how inspections are being conducted, and what organizations should do now to reduce risk and improve preparedness.
The National Emphasis Program (NEP) is OSHA's framework for identifying and addressing high-risk workplace hazards. The heat-focused NEP targets industries where workers are most exposed to elevated temperatures, including:
The program enables OSHA to conduct targeted inspections during high-heat periods, often without prior notice.
The NEP remains OSHA's primary enforcement mechanism while a federal heat standard is still under development. In practice, it allows OSHA to cite employers under the General Duty Clause if they fail to protect workers from known heat hazards.
Many employers assume inspections are random. Under the NEP, they are often data-driven and condition-based.
Common triggers include:
OSHA is increasingly focusing on indoor heat exposure, not just outdoor job sites. Facilities like warehouses, manufacturing plants, and kitchens are now firmly within scope.
During an inspection, OSHA evaluates whether an employer has taken reasonable steps to identify and control heat hazards.
Inspectors typically assess:
One of the most common challenges employers face is accurately assessing heat risk.
Many rely on:
However, these sources may not reflect actual working conditions, which can vary significantly based on:
Without location-specific data, organizations may underestimate risk—leading to unsafe conditions or inadequate response measures.
A common question is whether heat index is sufficient for workplace safety decisions.
WBGT is widely used in occupational health, military, and athletic settings because it better reflects how the human body experiences heat under real conditions.
To align with OSHA expectations and reduce risk, organizations should focus on practical, scalable improvements.
Don't wait for extreme heat days. Establish thresholds and action plans in advance.
Environmental conditions can vary across a single site. Assess heat exposure at the worker level, not just the regional level.
Monitoring alone is not enough. Define:
Keep records of:
This documentation can be critical during inspections.
Not yet. OSHA is working toward a formal rule, but enforcement currently occurs through the NEP and General Duty Clause.
No specific device is required. However, employers must demonstrate they are accurately assessing heat risk.
Yes. Indoor heat exposure is a growing focus of OSHA inspections.
Construction, agriculture, manufacturing, warehousing, and transportation are among the most frequently targeted.
The renewal of the NEP reflects a broader shift in workplace safety: from awareness to accountability.
Heat-related illness is largely preventable, yet it continues to result in serious injuries and fatalities each year. OSHA's continued enforcement signals that employers are expected to take measurable, proactive steps to protect workers.
With enforcement extended through 2026 and a federal heat rule still under consideration, organizations should view this moment as an opportunity to strengthen their approach.
A well-designed heat safety program is not just about compliance. It supports:
For more guidance on heat safety best practices, explore additional resources on HeatStress.com: